Thursday, February 25, 2016

Let's talk about you

Custom content is hard to pull off. It can be messy and time-consuming.

It’s like the guy in front of you at a busy deli who orders a Reuben sandwich, sliced diagonally with a green toothpick through each half and exactly three pickles; hold the sauerkraut.

The payoff, though, can be huge: a delicious sandwich or, better yet, a congratulatory phone call from the CEO.

Ragan’s custom workshops cater to corporate communications teams in need of individualized guidance. Mark Ragan and Jim Ylisela put their decades of experience to work by analyzing your content and leading an ultra-focused workshop on your turf.

That’s right, Mark and Jim come to your office to talk about your work and your goals.

The custom workshop themes revolve around your business needs, including but not limited to:

  • Communications strategy development
  • Crisis communications plan development
  • Custom communications training
  • Communication audits
  • Crisis communications plan development
  • Data visualization training
  • Editorial coaching, training and consulting
  • Executive communications strategy development
  • Infographics development
  • Intranet consulting
  • Media training
  • Storytelling with data training
  • Web development and construction

These workshops involve intensive, hands-on analysis from Mark and Jim, who’ve coached more than 10,000 communicators over the past decade.

Here’s just a sample of what you can expect when Mark Ragan comes to town:

[ Embed Custom Workshop vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=P7mijL4Xhms ]

Develop a custom workshop for your whole team by emailing Keri Gavin at kerig@ragan.com.

from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1S3EGpr via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1TGSBmB

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Brand journalism explained—in Academy Awards terms

From actor to director to script writer, movies are the culmination of many strong components.

A superior film can bring an Academy Award for Best Picture. It’s the same with brand journalism. When multiple elements within storytelling and branding come together, PR pros—and the organizations they represent—are winners.

As you watch the Oscars this month—and wait for Leonardo DiCaprio’s triumph or snub—this is how you can understand brand journalism in movie terms.

Best actor means content to us.

Academy_awards_1
(Source)

Seldom do critics applaud a movie unless it has a strong star performance. It’s the same scenario with content in brand journalism. Every brand journalism effort requires content to tell your story. Build your initiative on substance that will resonate and appeal to your target audience.

How to win: Understanding how to create content for press materials is not enough to claim victory. Today’s public relations professional must be skilled at creating both written and multimedia content for a variety of platforms.

[FREE guide: How to Be a Brand Journalist—Tell compelling stories and take your story directly to your audience]

Best supporting role means media relations to us.
Academy_Awards_2
(Source)

What’s the point of creating content if no one sees it? A strong media relations strategy can amplify your content. Brand journalism’s best supporting role goes to media relations, because this outreach gets your content in front of your target audience. Organizations that produce high-quality content for brand journalism will be remiss if they don’t integrate earned media into their initiative. PR placements—or free publicity—can quickly boost a brand’s credibility.

How to win: In addition to publishing content on your organization’s social media channels, have a strategy to pitch your content to journalists. Placements that don’t involve an exchange of money can maximize your message. If this isn’t your area of expertise, work with an agency or consultant who can show examples of earned media coverage for brand journalism content.

Best distribution means sharing and cross-promotion to us.

Academy_awards_3
(Source) 

Every successful movie studio has a distribution strategy that includes different avenues, such as theaters, online platforms and on-demand availability. Your brand journalism campaign will fall flat long before it reaches the red carpet if you don’t have a winning distribution plan that includes earned, owned and, if applicable, paid media placements.

How to win: Many vendors and agencies specialize in content distribution; however, there is no one-size-fits-all circulation package for brand journalism. Choose your channels based on the content you have to offer, your target audience and your goal.

People’s choice means value bombs to us.

Academy_awards_4
(Source)

The highest-grossing film often gets the public’s approval. With your brand journalism campaign, the more people you can reach in your target audience, the greater its perceived value will be. Put the needs of your audience first when building a brand journalism strategy.

How to win: Ask yourself what your ideal audience cares about and how they will benefit from your content. The human-centric philosophy is key when working as a brand journalist.

Now that you understand the elements of an award-winning brand journalism initiative, you may want to begin crafting your acceptance speech.

Lisa Arledge Powell is president of MediaSource, a content-focused public relations firm that specializes in brand journalism. MediaSource has been named Best Health Care Agency in 2013, 2014 and 2015 in Ragan’s Health Care PR & Marketing Awards. Connect on Twitter: @LisaArledge.

This article was created in partnership with MediaSource.



from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1R2NcjL via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1oBWyfc

CDC underestimates possible health risk from laminate floors

Call it a slip-up or a misstep.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has revised its Feb. 10 report about serious respiratory ailments that may result from laminate flooring.

On Monday, the CDC posted a statement to address its flawed information:

Health risks of people who have the laminate flooring are being revised to reflect greater exposure to formaldehyde, which could cause eye, nose, and throat irritation for anyone. The estimated risk of cancer associated with exposure to the flooring increased…The indoor air model used an incorrect value for ceiling height. As a result, the health risks were calculated using airborne concentration estimates about three times lower than they should have been.

[RELATED: Are you prepared for a crisis? Build a top-notch incident-response plan with this free download.]

At room temperature, formaldehyde is a colorless, flammable gas with a strong odor. The compound is also found in glue, paints and insulation.

The CDC statement doesn’t mention Lumber Liquidators, which sells more than $120 million annually in laminate flooring. The agency said earlier this month that formaldehyde levels in some of the company’s laminate products could cause two to nine cancer cases per 100,000 people. The new estimate is six to 30 cases per 100,000 people.

For consumers who may have already purchased the questionable flooring, CDC does offer a link to specific information on another website page.

CDC_floors_FB

CDC_floors_NBC_FB

A PR crisis for Lumber Liquidators

Lumber Liquidators’ spate of bad press began last year when “60 Minutes” first uncovered the story . USA Today reported that in 2015 the company “suspended sales of China-made laminates after accusations of carcinogenic qualities surfaced.” A class-action lawsuit has been filed, stocks have plunged, and the expoƛe prompted the resignation of CEO Robert Lynch last year.

CDC_floors_LawsuitFB

Standing its ground

Following the release of its new findings , the CDC said: “Our recommendations will likely remain the same. We strongly stress taking steps to reduce exposures, which should alleviate respiratory and eye, nose and throat irritation.”

Meanwhile, the Lumber Liquidators’ website doesn’t show a sign of trouble or how it might be addressing the issue. The site is full of sales promotions on hardwood and laminate floors, and it continues to tout its eco-friendly products:

CDC_LL_website

On Facebook, consumers seem to be skipping past the promotions and asking some tough questions:

CDC_LL_Facebook

In a statement, the company said: “We remain committed to operating with integrity and delivering quality flooring to our customers.”

It may appear to be business as usual at Lumber Liquidators, but not for CEO John Presley. In a letter to employees and stakeholders last week, Presley announced he had been diagnosed with leukemia.

"The good news is that it is a very treatable form of the disease with standard protocols for treatment, and we have caught it very early,” he wrote. According to Reuters, Presley will undergo a 30-day treatment near the company’s headquarters in Richmond, Virginia, and expects to stay involved in daily operations.



from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1p63YYR via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1mYzQgo

What brand managers should know about Facebook ‘Reactions’

The days of simply “liking” a Facebook post are officially over.

The social media mammoth announced a global rollout of its redesigned “like” button—Facebook Reactions—on Wednesday.

“Love,” “haha,” “wow,” “sad” and “angry” are five new Facebook buttons that users can click when responding to a post. Readers can choose from these ‘Reactions’ on top of liking, commenting or sharing Facebook posts.

Here’s how Facebook’s product manager, Sammi Krug, described Reactions’ debut in a statement:

We understand that this is a big change, and want to be thoughtful about rolling this out. For more than a year we have been conducting global research including focus groups and surveys to determine what types of reactions people would want to use most. We also looked at how people are already commenting on posts and the top stickers and emoticons as signals for the types of reactions people are already using to determine which reactions to offer.

Krug says that the user feedback thus far has been positive.

On the marketing side, Socialbakers’ communications manager Ryan Hatoum says Reactions will give brand managers more insight into their audiences.

“[Brands] are going to have a lot more data to play around with when it comes to understanding how their content is performing, and how their audiences are receiving it,” he says. “[When you] add in the fact that using Reactions is simpler and easier for people than typing out a comment, it’s likely that brands will be getting more engagement than they would without the feature.”

RELATED: Escalate your social media game at Ragan’s Disney best practices summit.

Hatoum says Facebook giving consumers access to an ‘angry’ button may head off a crisis.

“Reactions could help with foresight on social [media], including getting a heads up on things like social marketing crises,” he says. “A ton of ‘angry’ Reactions would reflect that a brand released a controversial piece of content. It’ll also be interesting to see how the ‘like’ Reaction is used versus the ‘love’ one.”

As Facebook users increase use of the tool, PR pros will have a better understanding of how to digest the information.

“It’s way too early to tell right now how consumers will use it,” Hatoum says. “That context will be necessary to understanding how to read the data.”

How do you see Facebook Reactions impacting your brand’s social media presence?

(Image via)

from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1oBMXoO via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1p5UNrt

5 reputation-building tips from DC Water

Crisis communications tend to address the immediate: monitoring social media, fielding reporters’ phone calls, sending executives out to face the firing squad of a hostile press conference.

What gets less attention is the long slog to rebuild a reputation after a crisis that initiates lawsuits, a media pummeling and congressional hearings.

Just ask DC Water, which provides Washington, D.C., with drinking water and wastewater treatment. Twelve years after lead contamination in the capital’s taps made national news, a similar crisis in Flint, Michigan, is bringing attention to DC Water’s long-term effort to restore its reputation.

“We’re still working to rebuild the trust of our customers and earn back the trust that we lost during our own lead crisis,” says John Lisle, DC Water’s chief of external affairs.

Underscoring that, national journalists with the memory of elephants have been phoning DC Water lately to add quotes to stories about Flint’s crisis.

DC Water’s success offers encouragement to organizations that have seen public trust collapse. It proves, however, that communications is a multiyear endeavor. Organizations must commit to openness-even when that means tweeting your own bad news or sending your chief executive into town hall meetings to face your most severe critics.

Here are some tips for rebuilding trust between an organization and the public:

1. Be transparent.

When George Hawkins arrived as general manager and chief executive in 2009, he rebranded the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority as DC Water and beefed up the communications staff.

DC Water provides more than 672,000 residents and 17.8 million annual visitors in the District of Columbia with water and sewer service. It also treats wastewater for neighboring counties. The infrastructure has been crumbling, and the median age of water pipes is 79 years.

That means an organization with a tainted water scandal in the not-so-distant past was going to have to persuade taxpayers to support a fee to raise $40 million a year to replace the pipes.

“We need to educate people about, yes, you’re paying more, but this is why you’re paying more,” says Lisle, who also arrived after the lead crisis. “You have to have the trust of your customers for them to be willing to pay more for the service that you provide.”

2. Hear out your critics.

Five years ago, Hawkins initiated an annual round of town hall meetings every spring in each ward of the city. He reviews the rates and the budget. DC Water goes out of its way to make sure people know about the meetings by robo-calling citizens who have contacted the service in the previous 12 months.

Typically, these aren’t people who called up to say thanks for that refreshing glass of water. They tend to be critics who had a problem or a billing dispute, says Lisle. Yet the town hall audience has even been known to applaud at the end.

Utilities communicators: Inspire trust in your community with quick and effective crisis management plans.

“People might come upset that their water bill has gone up, but they leave with a better appreciation of why that is,” Lisle says.

3. Meet the people where they are.

DC Water sends employees to community events, from small block parties to the H Street Festival, where it brings coolers full of ice water and hands out water bottles and information. The organization also showed up at a city viewing party for a World Cup game last summer.

It finds that many people don’t even know where their water comes from (the Potomac River). “It’s also an opportunity for us to educate people, have discussions with them, pass out information if they’re interested about how drinking water, how tap water compares with bottled water.”

Lisle explains: “If somebody comes up at an event and says, ‘I have a question for you: How do I know my water is safe?’ Or, 'I’ve been boiling my water.’ That’s an opportunity to say, 'Why are you boiling your water?’”

Often their fears date back to the lead crisis; face-to-face discussions can make a big difference in attitude toward the water bearers.

4. Be strategic on social media.

DC Water has a dedicated digital communications manager who handles accounts on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Just as the utility puts out a press release, it provides news updates through these platforms.

Despite the daily noise, the organization keeps its long-term communications at the forefront when it uses these channels. In the winter, when there are water main breaks, it discusses what people can do to fix or avoid frozen pipes.

“If we have a water main breaks that ties up traffic—and we’ve had some of those—then that’s also an opportunity for us to educate people about how old the infrastructure is, what we’re doing to replace it,” Lisle says.

5. Break your own bad news.

Since Hawkins arrived, DC Water has issued water advisories five times, including two do-not-drink advisories. These related to problems such as a complaint of a petroleum smell in the water and a broken pump that resulted in lost pressure in part of the District.

None of the problems proved to be serious, but DC Water made sure it was first to announce the news. Otherwise, the conversation would begin anyway, and inaccurate information could gain legs. Likewise, DC Water doesn’t want to give the impression that it knew about a problem and didn’t inform the public.

“We don’t take any chances,” Lisle says. “We tell people what we know when we know it, and we’re abundantly cautious about any potential threat to drinking water safety.”

@ByWorking

from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1KLKEKj via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1LGAKV0

Communicators, what's your superpower?

As a person who writes at work, what are your opportunities, and what are your strengths?

This is how I invite people to introduce themselves in my writing workshops. In response, people are quick to proclaim what they can’t do.

  • My boss says I’m wordy.
  • I’ve never been good at grammar.
  • Ideas that sound awesome in my head are a jumbled mess when I try to write them down.

These honest self-assessments are useful. It’s important to know where you need to grow, but it’s also good to admit your strengths. So I press for positives. Even then, some people struggle to say they’re good at anything.

Really? There’s not one thing you do well?

I don’t buy it. I have yet to meet anyone who doesn’t have something to contribute as a business communicator. Every team has a mix of skills.

Consider the following specialties:

Error eliminator. You have an eagle eye for extra spaces, repeated words and excessive capitalization. You would never allow “your” where “you’re” should be. You may or may not be able to spot problems in your own work, but you sure can proofread mine.

Consistency whiz. Parallel structure makes you smile. In a flash, you spot that one Helvetica sentence in a sea of Arial. You don’t care if people debate the Oxford comma all day, as long as they pick an approach and stick to it. You’re a little obsessive compulsive. We like that about you.

Straight talk maestro. Your messages are short, probably not sweet. You get to the point with active voice, clear directives and strong calls to action. What you lack in tact, you make up in impact.

Spelling superstar. You never hesitate when typing words like accommodate, judgment and misspell. You aced so many spelling tests in elementary school, you still expect that people who read your email will respond with gold stars.

Doctor of organization. Structure is your middle name. You stack sentences like building blocks, putting them in an order that gets attention, makes sense and emphasizes what matters.

Visual virtuoso. You make messages sparkle. With tasteful use of type, color, bullets, images and all-important white space, you bring visual order to a chaotic page. You probably even know all the keyboard shortcuts.

[Free download: A communicator’s guide to crafting videos that captivate and engage employees.]

Last-minute leader. You are calm under pressure, not intimidated by tight turnaround times. You do some of your best work at the eleventh hour. Maybe that’s why you procrastinate so much.

Creative genius. While your colleagues debate names to include in the cc: field, you’re at the whiteboard, sketching out key points, five alternative subject lines and a Venn diagram to illustrate the message. Hearing, “We’ve always done it this way,” compels you to create a new way.

Polished professional. Whether the news is good or bad, you manage to say it with clarity and grace. You turn complex concepts into simple sentences. You really have a way with words.

See anyone you know? I bet you recognized a co-worker or two. Tell them. Let them know you’ve seen their communication skills in action, and you want the benefit of their help.

Better yet, own up to your communication superpower. Stop being humble. Confess your skills to your colleagues. Recognizing your strengths can give you the confidence you need to move forward in your career. Sharing them with others expands the value you offer your team.

Show your skills. Pool your intellectual resources, and use the full strength of your team to make great messages happen.

As a communicator, leader, advisor, teacher and founder of Spencer Grace, Beth Nyland helps people improve the quality of their communications. A version of this article originally appeared on SpencerGrace.com.

from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1LcEDpR via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1QdmPry

J&J ordered to pay $72M over carcinogen claims

Johnson & Johnson has suffered a major early blow in a series of legal battles over talc.

On Monday night, jurors in St. Louis’ circuit court ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay the family of Jacqueline Fox $72 million. The family’s lawyers and court records report that $10 million was awarded for actual damages and $62 million in punitive damages.

Fox died of ovarian cancer in October—which was linked to her frequent use of Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products in her feminine hygiene routine for more than 35 years.

The family accused the company of fraud, negligence and conspiracy, claiming that Johnson & Johnson knew its talc-based products could cause cancer and that it failed to warn consumers.

A lawyer for Fox’s family, Jere Beasley, told reporters that the company “knew as far back as the 1980s of the risk,” but continued “lying to the public, lying to the regulatory agencies.”

The family’s suit—which, The Guardian reported, was part of bigger claim in St. Louis that involved almost 60 people—is far from the only one against Johnson & Johnson.

The Huffington Post reported that roughly 1,000 cases have been filed in Missouri’s state court along with an additional 200 in New Jersey’s state court. Trials for some of these lawsuits are set for dates later this year.

Monday’s verdict is the first time a United States jury awarded damages over the claims.

Johnson & Johnson spokesman Carol Goodrich told Reuters that the scientific evidence shows the safety of talc:

We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial. We sympathize with the plaintiff’s family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence.

Goodrich also issued a statement to CNN that said the company “strongly disagree[d] with the outcome.”

RELATED: Keep your cool in crises with these 13 tips. 

The lawsuits are also not the only crises surrounding product ingredients that Johnson & Johnson have responded to, The Guardian further explained:

In May 2009, a coalition of groups called the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics began pushing Johnson & Johnson to eliminate questionable ingredients from its baby and adult personal care products. After three years of petitions, negative publicity and a boycott threat, the company agreed in 2012 to eliminate the ingredients 1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde, both considered probable human carcinogens, from all products by 2015.

CNN reported that talc—used in cosmetics as an absorbent—has left scientists divided over whether the ingredient is carcinogenic:

Scientists are divided over the potential risks of talc. Lawyers for Fox’s family presented several studies they said prove the link between talc and ovarian cancer. Other studies say the evidence is too weak to make the connection.

The American Cancer Society says it is not clear if products containing talcum powder increase cancer risk. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization, classifies talc as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

CNN also reported that because Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products are considered cosmetics, they are not reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration.

Nora Freeman Engstrom, a Stanford University law professor told The Associated Press that the awarded amount—especially the $62 million in punitive damages—would probably be decreased on appeal.

However, Engstrom said that the recent verdict “doesn’t bode well for Johnson & Johnson” in the face of the additional lawsuits.

“This case clearly was a bellwether, and clearly the jury has seen the evidence and found it compelling,” Engstrom said.

How do you think the company is handling its public response in the face of this verdict, PR Daily readers?

(Image via)

from Ragan.com http://ift.tt/1PZYZBI via web video marketing
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1S1brDK